Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 2025-ld-jan [2024/12/19 15:22]
scox [ICC--Affirm]
+++ 2025-ld-jan [2024/12/19 17:25] (current)
scox [Law of the Sea--Affirm]
@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
   * **Strengthen sovereignty**
     *The UNCLOS would codify the U.S.'s property claims in the Arctic and on its EEZ.
+  * **Resources**
+    * [[https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/pb137.pdf|Brookings Institute Brief]]
+    * [[https://education.cfr.org/teach/mini-simulation/should-united-states-ratify-law-sea|Council on Foreign Relations Overview]]
+    * [[https://www.jag.navy.mil/national-security/law-of-the-sea/|Navy JAG Corps]]
+    * [[https://progressivereform.org/cpr-blog/navigating-the-high-seas-why-the-u-s-should-ratify-the-law-of-the-sea-treaty/|Center for Progressive Reform]]
+    * [[2025-ld-jan-aff-unclos|Sample Affirmative]]
 =====Law of the Sea--Negate=====
@@ Line 65: / Line 71: @@
   * **Lawsuits**
     * UNCLOS could expose the U.S. to frivolous lawsuits
+  * **Resources**
+    * [[https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/pb137.pdf|Brookings Institute Brief]]
+    * [[https://education.cfr.org/teach/mini-simulation/should-united-states-ratify-law-sea|Council on Foreign Relations Overview]]
+    * [[https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/commentary/should-the-us-ratify-the-un-convention-the-law-the-sea|Heritage Foundation #1]]
+    * [[https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/commentary/7-reasons-us-should-not-ratify-un-convention-the-law-the-sea|Heritage Foundation #2]]
+    * [[https://www.unclosdebate.org/argument/288/us-should-not-ratify-united-nations-convention-law-sea-unclos|Various]]
+    * [[https://freedomalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ratifying-UN-Treaty.pdf|Freedom Alliance]]

Science of Technology

User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

Page Tools